MOZ

How to Include Influencers in Your Content Strategy

542b33e1a8a7e4.47038960.png

Posted by Amanda_Gallucci

This post was originally in YouMoz, and was promoted to the main blog because it provides great value and interest to our community. The author's views are entirely his or her own and may not reflect the views of Moz, Inc.

The first thing most people think when they hear "influencers" is promotion. Important people with an engaged following can amplify the reach of whatever idea, content or brand they choose to share. If you only weave influencers into your content strategy when your finished product is ready to be promoted, however, you're missing out on the full potential of having respected experts on your team.

Knowing when and how they can best be engaged at different stages is critical to moving these leaders from outside influencers to brand partners.

Measure an influencer's true value

In order to find the right influencers to give your content strategy a boost, you first should understand what makes a person an influencer and how influence will play a role within the larger content landscape.

Whether you're looking to build brand awareness or drive traffic, what matters is not sheer numbers of followers, but the amount of engaged followers.

Twitalyzer's analytics provide a good start to assessing who is influential on Twitter. The tool measures not only the potential impact users have based on their number of followers, but also the likelihood that other Twitter users will retweet or mention a particular user.

Beyond finding an influencer who's engaged enough to spread your message, also consider how this person became influential in the first place. Whether he or she has years of experience, brilliant ideas, cohesive arguments or all of the above, consider how you can harness these strengths to maximize your potential for creating a successful relationship. Asking influencers to tweet out a link might give you a bump in traffic, but asking for their opinions, advice and time in different ways will be infinitely more valuable.

Lead with strategy

How influencers fit into your campaign should be determined according to audience research and campaign goals. Know what platforms your target audience interacts with, what interests are strong enough to drive them to take action and who they trust. The more naturally these insights are woven into your content, the easier it will be to find influencers in this segment who will appreciate what you have to share.

Campaign goals are equally crucial because depending on what you want to achieve, you might change the angle of your messaging or favor different platforms. Not every influencer has the same level of activity and reach on every social channel, so identify influencers who are stars on the right platforms. Similarly, tailor your message for each influencer so that anything they share on your behalf looks organic alongside their other content.

Once you have a solid foundation for your strategy, start looking for influencers and begin your outreach process. With enough lead time to send along a beta version or rough draft, you can tweak content based on their feedback. You'll also need allow time for them to collaborate with you on original content, create any sponsored or guest content or write a review or give a quote that you can use on your content's release.

Don't ask for too much of an influencer's time, however, especially if you are asking for offhand feedback and not entering into a paid engagement. Build a relationship before you ask for favors, and even still, make the ask as easy as possible by providing the right amount of background and simplifying what you want the person to do. Rand's Whiteboard Friday on earning the amplification of influencer walks through the importance of the relationship-building aspect and enticing influencers with what's in it for them.

Find influencers

With a clear understanding of the role influencers play within your overall strategy, you're ready to identify the right candidates.

Countless tools are available to help you find influencers in different verticals, so choose based on the action you want the influencer to take. If you are searching for a thought leader who can write engaging content, a tool like ClearVoice will help you find credible authors who focus on a particular topic. For each writer, you can view a list of articles he or she has written on that subject.

image host

When you need social influencers who can help you amplify content, Buzzsumo is a great tool. Through their Influencer search, you can find people who frequently share content on a given topic and can click through to see what these links are.

542b33e610b8f6.92633300.png

Another approach to finding social influencers is to search Twitter bios using Followerwonk and sorting by Social Authority.

542b33e821e0c1.60336850.png

Engage influencers at different stages

Outreach

Outreach ideally starts with organically following influencers and engaging with them over time. Then reaching out to them via email or social media is less about introductions and more about the specific project you want to pitch to the influencer.

There will also be times when you find an influencer who aligns with your strategy but you don't have the relationship-building lead time. For this cold outreach, write a succinct introduction that includes goals your goals for the content and the benefits the influencer will receive by working with you. Then make your ask. Personalization and quality are key. If you find outreach challenging, this guide from Portent is a great place to start.

Make outreach easier for yourself by using a tool like BuzzStream that automates and tracks the process. It will help you find contacts at certain publishers—giving you the twofold opportunity to pitch your own content as well as get in touch with influential authors. It also generates templated, customizable outreach emails.

542b33ebcc0947.89852064.png

Just remember, even if you already have a solid relationship with an influencer, show that you value his or her time. Do as much of the groundwork as you can in advance. For instance, if you want people to share something on social, draft one to three example social posts specifically crafted for each influencer and platform.

Start of relationship

Once an influencer agrees to work with you, provide just the right amount of background information and instruction. This will vary by project and influencer.

For an influencer creating content, define the basics (e.g., article, ebook, video, etc.), in addition to length and editorial theme. Find a good balance between leaving room for the influencer to share his or her expertise, while setting up key points and takeaways you want the content to achieve. You should also create and send an abbreviated style guide. There's no need to disclose every internal note you have, but if you can provide the basic stylistic do's and don'ts, product or company background, audience information, and voice and tone guidelines, you will spend less time on edits and back-and-forths with the influencer. Set clear expectations and schedule benchmark dates where you can check in on progress and make revisions where necessary.

In the case of engaging influencers to amplify content, you won't need to give quite as much guidance on how to craft the social message, but you can still offer suggestions on angles that would work well or any topics or phrases your brand wouldn't want to be associated with. It's also important to provide summaries of any piece of content you are asking influencers to share so that a) if they don't have time to read every word, they still feel comfortable with the concept and b) there won't have to be any guesswork in deciding what part of the content is most important to share.

Relationship maintenance

If your experience with an influencer is mutually beneficial and you know you'll want to partner again, make sure to check in periodically. Don't ask for something new every time you reach out. Keep in touch by sending along interesting content or company updates the influencer might find useful. Better yet, always extend a congratulations on a promotion or a new position.

To ensure you remember to engage with the right people, use tools like Commun.it, which identify the influential people you interact with on Twitter, and prompt you to re-engage with people you haven't @ mentioned recently.

542b33ed7b2c95.46302955.png

LinkedIn Contacts is also a handy way to keep track of conversations and check on any updates on the influencer's end to look out for opportunities to get in touch.

As you continue to grow existing influencer relationships, adjust your overarching strategy to incorporate more key industry leaders. Create new roles for influencers to play in shaping your content and its promotion.

Always be strategizing

The best way to include influencers in your content strategy is to involve them at every stage of the process, including:

  1. Creation: Plan out what types of influencers will be helpful and the role they should play based on the target audience and campaign goals.
  2. Implementation: Share a strategic brief with onboarded influencers and leave flexibility for changes based on the influencer's feedback.
  3. Measurement: Factor in the reach of influencers as part of the success of your campaign.

Over time, integrating and managing influencer relationships will become second nature, and they will seem more like team members and partners.


Sign up for The Moz Top 10, a semimonthly mailer updating you on the top ten hottest pieces of SEO news, tips, and rad links uncovered by the Moz team. Think of it as your exclusive digest of stuff you don't have time to hunt down but want to read!

By |October 29th, 2014|MOZ|0 Comments

It’s Time to Treat Content as Part of the User Experience

Posted by wrttnwrd

Forget content marketing, SEO content, and whatever else as you know them. We need to fundamentally change our approach to content. It's not an add-on or a separate thing. It's an inseparable part of the user experience. Let's act that way.

Content: the silent epidemic

Your site's infested.

Most organizations treat content like some kind of horrific disease. They try to shove it as far away as possible from the "real" web site, like a bad case of body lice.

Where do they put it? The blog, of course:

Don't worry, this isn't another put-the-blog-on-the-site-dammit rant. Hopefully, you already understand that blog.site.com isn't as good as site.com/blog.

They also incorrectly define "content." Content isn't "stuff we write to rank higher" or "infographics" or "longform articles."

Content is anything that communicates a message to the audience. Anything.

Product descriptions? Content.

The company story? Content.

Images? Content.

That video of your company picnic that someone posted to your site three years ago and shows everyone dressed as Muppets? Content.

If it says something, shows something, or otherwise communicates, it's content.

Change your approach

We all need to change our entire approach to content. Treat it as part of the user experience, instead of a nasty skin disease:

  1. Integrate content that can enhance the user experience
  2. Optimize what you already have

Integrate content that can enhance the user experience

Interlink and integrate related information. That includes connecting promotional to informational and showing related visuals and text on promotional pages.

"Promotional" means product descriptions or anything else that "sells" an idea or makes a call to action to the visitor.

Companies are terrified of this. They believe it'll send customers away. But it doesn't happen.

I have never seen revenue drop because of interlinking or other integration. I have seen it generate long-term customer relationships, increase referrals and increase near-term conversions.

Link to the blog

If nothing else, link to relevant blog posts. People intent on making a purchase aren't going to click away never to return. Check out how Surly Bikes does it:

moz_content_4.jpg

(By the way, that bike's a steal at $2,700, if anyone's trying to figure out what to get me for Hanukkah this year.)

Linking to a relevant post allows really interested visitors to drill down an additional layer of detail. They can get impressions, learn why one product might be better for them than another, and maybe even (gasp) realize that the folks behind the product are just like them.

Embed related social content

Urban Outfitters does so much right. They have an amazing Instagram account:

But, for some reason, they don't link to it from product pages.

It's OK. I'm not cool enough for their stuff anyway. But why hide all those attractive people using their products? That'll encourage all sorts of purchasers.

Also, link to related social content right from your product pages. Ideally, you want to embed examples right in the page. At the very least, link prominently to the relevant account (but seriously, embed the examples).

Here's another example. I'm definitely a Democrat, but I have to offer a tip to the other side of the aisle here: If you have someone with decent YouTube videos, include 'em. Representative DeSantis has an entire YouTube channel. Why not show a few videos here?

moz_content_9.jpg

If you want to see someone do it right, have a look at top10.com. They're pulling Instagram images straight into their hotel information.

You can do this with any social platform that lets you: Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Pinterest, Vine, etc. So what's stopping you?

Optimize what you already have

Your site is already stuffed with content.

You might deny it. But it's true.

So why not optimize what you've got?

Write decent descriptions

Whatever you're selling/promoting, write a decent description. That includes category pages. I'm not sure what to say about the following top-of-category page "description," so I'll go with hysterical, bitter laughter:

moz_content_12.png

By the way, for those who think this kind of content is a great SEO tactic, this site's on page 2 for "jeans."

I'm not thrilled with this one, as it's buried at the bottom of the category page and a little keyword stuffed, but compared to the previous, it's a shining light in the darkness:

moz_content_13.png

That site ranks #3 for "jeans."

Even if you care only about rankings, better descriptions are a better strategy.

At this time, the #1 site for "jeans" has a description buried at the bottom of their category page that's so awful I cried. I'll dig into that another time, but I doubt that travesty is helping them much, and more importantly, it sure doesn't make me want to buy anything.

Don't be ashamed

Your content is not a zit. Show it proudly. I like the way Juicy Couture does it. I can actually read the product description:

moz_content_10.jpg

This, on the other hand, makes me think I need bifocals.

moz_content_11.png

That's actual size, by the way.

Follow the same rules of typography you would anywhere else. Make sure your type is high-contrast and readable. Put it somewhere that I'll actually see it. At the very least, don't hide it, for heaven's sake.

Guide me when I'm lost

Please don't redirect me to a category page without any explanation. I'm not bashing a pinata.

Blindfolding me, spinning me around 8 times and then sending me on my way is not entertaining. It's annoying as hell.

If I search for a product you no longer sell, and click the description:

moz_content_5.png

  1. Show me the product page with a "Sorry, this product is no longer available. But you might like..." and send me along
  2. Or show me a note explaining what just happened

Urban Outfitters does it right:

moz_content_7.jpg

Nice!

You might be thinking, "Hey, that's not content!"

Yeah, it is. When content disappears, send me to stuff you've got. Content UX 101.

Oh, and that technology thing...

One last step: You need to enable all of this through technology. You have to be able to do all the stuff I listed above. That requires the right tools.

This is the source of teeth-grinding frustration for many content folks. If you can't edit the site, you can't do any of this stuff, right? Weellll yes and no. Here are things I've tried, and the result:

  1. Screaming. Generally a turn-off. Never gets the desired result.
  2. Demanding. See screaming.
  3. Asking, with a justification. Ask for the features you need, explaining why and how they might help. If you can, show competitors who are doing the same thing. This can take.... a..... long....... time. But it works.
  4. Getting small wins. Can't add a new page? Edit a product description. Can't add a new chunk of content to a product page? Add a little bit to the existing description, or edit it as desired. This one works pretty well, but keep asking for the other features, or you'll never make progress.
  5. Move off the site. You can set up a separate blog, social media account, whatever. I usually punch myself in the spleen right about then, but this can get results, especially for a big brand. Record the results and use that to advocate for more. Best if used in tandem with #3. Runs directly counter to half this article, but what're you gonna do?

I'm sorry I don't have an easier solution here. Just remember you're not the only person asking the IT team for stuff, or telling your boss you're being prevented from doing a good job, and proceed accordingly.

If you are the boss or IT team, and you're reading this, please: Don't sacrifice content or shove it off the site. Listen to your marketers. They want to succeed. "Helped triple revenue" looks a lot better on a resume than "Proposed worthless ideas." So they've got significant incentive.

OK, but is this legit?

I have to admit, I don't have data on all of this. Know what? Not all marketing is data-driven. But look at some real-life examples of user experience optimization through content:

In the "real world," the environment is the content:

  • Starbucks doesn't just operate a bunch of walk-in, walk-out coffee shops. They provide music, comfy chairs and nice people. An experience. Not a transaction.
  • New car dealers have completely transformed from big lots with cheesy pitches to mini-museums.
  • Airlines attempt to sell an experience. Some do it better than others. And it's not about money. "Low fare" airlines like Southwest have been particularly successful.

Online, features and... well, content are the content.

  • Amazon feels like a purely transactional site at first. But in-depth reviews, editors' comments, lists of recently-viewed items and other gadgetry transform the site.
  • Woot.com lives and breathes cool content. It's their brand, and it's an intimate part of the user experience.
  • And check out Surly, as I said above.

These brands all do pretty well, yes? Good content UX sure doesn't hurt.

Another example: We worked with a major fashion brand. We got them thinking about the content user experience. They integrated, and optimized their product descriptions. Our technical recommendations had to wait for release cycles. It didn't matter. They immediately hit number one for the most competitive phrases in their industry. Coincidence? I think not. So, even if rankings are your only goal, content UX is a powerful tool.

Get to work

Practice user experience optimization through content. By "optimization," I don't mean "stuffing in keywords until readers want to puke." I mean "optimal combination of promotional and informational content."

Content optimization drives interest, engagement and yes, rankings. It also takes visitors from transactional to loyal.


Sign up for The Moz Top 10, a semimonthly mailer updating you on the top ten hottest pieces of SEO news, tips, and rad links uncovered by the Moz team. Think of it as your exclusive digest of stuff you don't have time to hunt down but want to read!

By |October 29th, 2014|MOZ|0 Comments

Semantic Analytics: How to Track Performance and ROI of Structured Data

Posted by Mike_Arnesen

If you're interested in tracking the ROI of adding semantic markup to your website, while simultaneously improving your web analytics, this post is for you! Join me, friend.

Semantic markup and structured data: Can I get a heck yes?!

If you haven't heard of semantic markup and the SEO implications of applying said markup, you may have been living in a dark cave with no WiFi for the past few years. Or perhaps you're new to this whole search marketing thing. In the later case, I won't fault you, but you should really check this stuff out, because it's the future.

That said, I'd wager most people reading this post are well acquainted with semantic markup and the idea of structured data. More than likely, you have some of this markup on your site already and you probably have some really awesome rich snippets showing up in search.

Organic snippets like these are why most SEOs are implementing semantic markup. I don't think we need to debate that. Everyone wants to get those beautiful, attractive, CTR-boosting rich snippets and, in some cases, you're at a competitive disadvantage simply by not having them.

If you're like me, you love seeing your sites earn rich snippets in Google's search results. I loved it so much that I let myself believe that this was the end goal of semantic markup: landing the rich snippet. When I implemented markup for various entities on the sites I worked on, I'd get the markup added to the site's code, verify that it was successfully crawled, watch the rich snippet show up, and then call it a victory! Hooray!

Tracking the ROI of semantic markup

Well, I've come to the realization that this simply can't be the measure of success for your semantic SEO strategy! What difference does that rich snippet really make? C'mon, be honest. Do you know what the real impact was? Can you speak to your boss or your client about how pages with a specific type of markup are performing compared to their non-marked up counterparts? Another question to ask: Are you leveraging that semantic data for as much value as you can?

Is there a way to more effectively track the ROI of semantic markup implementation while simultaneously giving us a deeper level of insight regarding how our site is performing?

The answer is yes! How? It's (relatively) easy, because we've already done the hard work. Through applying semantic markup to our site, we've embedded an incredibly rich layer of meaningful data in our code. Too often, SEOs like us forget that the idea of the semantic web extends far beyond search engines. It's easy to add schema.org entity markup to our pages and and think that it ends when search engines pick up on it. But that can't be the end of the story! Don't let the search engines have all the fun; we can use that data, too.

By looking at the semantic markup on any given page, we can see what type of "entity" we're looking at (be it an "Event," "Person," "Product," "Article," or anything else) and we can also see what attributes or properties that entity has. If we could gather that information and pump it into an analytics platform, we'd really have something great. So let's do that!

Using Google Tag Manager to record structured data

Google Tag Manager was the game changer I didn't know I needed. There are a few great posts that provide nice overviews of GTM, so I won't get too deep into that here, but the key capability of Google Tag Manager that is going to allow us to do amazing things is its inherent ability to be awesome.

Okay, let me explain.

The value of any tag management platform lies in its ability to fire off tags dynamically based off of Rules and Macros. This is incredible for anyone doing advanced analytics tracking because you can attach granular tracking elements to various sections of your site without (theoretically) ever having to touch your code. Need to track a click on an image banner in your sidebar? Just set up a Tag in Google Tag Manager that fires based on a Rule that uses a Macro to identify that image banner in the code of your site!

So what I'm ultimately trying to share with you through this post is a methodology for using GTM to bring your semantic markup in to your analytics platform so you can not just track the ROI of adding semantic markup to your site, but leverage that markup for a deeper level of insight into your data. I've taken to calling this "semantic analytics."

Tags, rules, and macros

Before we get into the nuts and bolts of how this all works, let's go over Tags, Rules, and Macros in Google Tag Manager.

  • Tags: In the context of analytics, a Tag is any piece of tracking code that is going to send information back to Google Analytics (or your analytics platform of choice). Nearly every site on the web is going to have a basic pageview tracking Tag on every page; every time you load a page, that Tag is fired and sends information about that pageview to an analytics platform (e.g. Google Analytics). But we can get even better intelligence by having additional tags send other information into Google, like "event" tags which can send information for things that happen on the site (clicks, scrolling, non-click interactions, video plays, etc.). Google Tag Manager lets you configure any Tag you want, which will fire based on a Rule.
  • Rules: A Rule in Google Tag Manager tells a Tag when to fire. Without a Rule attached to a Tag, it will never fire (i.e. send info to Google Analytics) so the most basic Rule is one that is triggered on every page. However, you could set up a thank-you page conversion event tag for AdWords, for example, that only fires on a page with a URL matching /contact-form/thank-you/.
  • Macros: Macros are by far the most powerful features in Google Tag Manager. Their power seems almost limitless, but the key thing we'll be looking at here is the ability to create a JavaScript Macro that will look in the DOM (Document Object Model) for specific elements. This allows you to look for specific elements in the HTML and fire events based on what you find.

What we'll want to do in Google Tag Manger is create a Macro that looks for semantic markup in the code of a page. We can then use a Rule to fire a Tag every time someone views a page that has semantic markup on it and include event labels that record what type of entity that person looked at. Ultimately, this will let us drill down into analytics and view reports to see how marked up pages perform against their non-marked up counterparts. We can even pull out granular properties of entities and analyze based on those (for example, pull the "performer" item property out of all "Event" entities and see which "performers" got more traffic and/or led to more conversion events).

Setting up semantic analytics

So let's walk though the whole semantic analytics process using a website that lists industry events as an example. Since I'm familiar with it, let's use SwellPath.com as our example since we list all the events we present at in our Resources section.

For each industry event on our site, we have semantic markup that specifies the Event schema.org itemtype and defines various associated itemprops, including the speaker (itemprop="performer"), venue (itemprop="eventVenue"), event name (itemprop="name"), and time (itemprop="startTime"). At the most basic level, I want to be able to track all the pages that have Event markup. If I wanted to get ambitious (which I do!), I want to pull the speaker name, event name, and venue name, too.

To do this, we'll want to set up a Macro, which is the condition for a Rule, which then fires a Tag. However, we're going to dive into that progression in reverse order. Yeah, we're going full Tarantino.

Setting up the Tag

The Tag we want to set up in Google Tag Manager will look like this:

The category for all of our semantic events will be "Semantic Markup," so we can use it to group together any page with markup on it. The event action will be "Semantic - Event Markup On-Page" (even though it's not much of an "action," per se). Finally, we'll want to make the label pretty specific the individual item we're talking about, so we'll pull in the speaker's name and combine it with the even name so we have plenty of context. We'll use a Macro for that, but more on that below.

Configuring the Rule

Without a Rule though, our Tag won't ever fire. We can't just set it up to fire on every page, though; we need to have a Rule that says "only fire this tag if semantic markup is on the page." Our Rule will include two conditions.

  1. The first condition looks for an event that is equal to "gtm.dom". This is an event that Google Tag Manager can pick up out-of-the-box and it means the that Document Object Model (DOM) finished loading (in simple terms, the page finished downloading). The reason we need this is because we need to tell Google Tag Manager to look in our code to find semantic markup; it doesn't make sense to do that before the page has finished loading.
  2. The second condition for our Rule is a Macro that's going to look for specific markup on the page.

Building the Macro

The Macro is the really cool part! To get it set up, we'll create a Macro that uses "Custom JavaScript." Inside of the Macro, we essentially want to create a function that looks for our itemtype tag from schema.org on the page and returns either "true" or "false". The screenshot that follows shows what it looks like when you set it up in Google Tag Manager, but I've provided the text of the Macro as well so you can cut and paste.

function () {
   var SemElem = document.querySelectorAll('[itemtype*="Event"]');
   SemElem = SemElem.length > 0 ? true : false;
   return SemElem;
}

Keep in mind that I'm using jQuery here to make sure it works across most browsers. Make sure that whatever site you implement this on also has jQuery installed, or this Macro won't work.

While we're here, we'll also create a Macro to pull out specific itemprops that we want to use later. Specifically, the event name and the performer name. We can then combine those two variables in our Macro function to form a sentence that we'll use as an event label later on. I also added an If statement so that it returns "No semantic data" if any important events are missing.

function () {
   var venue = $('[itemtype*="Event"] [itemprop*="name"]') [0];
   var performer = $('[itemtype*="Event"] [itemprop*="performer"]') .text();

   venue = $(venue).text();

   label = performer + " at " + venue + " (Semantic Event)";

   check = venue.length > 0 ? true : false;
   if (check === false) {
      label = "No semantic data";
      return label;
   }
   else {
      return label;
   }
}

Putting it all together

To actually set this up in Google Tag Manager, you'll set up all the elements we just discussed in reverse order (do you get my previous Tarantino joke now?). First, create your Macros in GTM. Then create your Rule using the Macro you just created as one of the criterium. Finally, create your Tag that fires based on the Rule.

From there, you can push the new version of your GTM Container Tag live. If you're smart, though, you'll run it in Debug Mode first and make sure that you have it set up correctly.

Naming Conventions

What good is a standardized vocabulary for your web data if you don't have a standardized naming convention for your Google Tag Manager and Google Analtyics set up? Here's what I use, but feel free to use what works for you:

  • Macros: Semantic - {Item Type} Markup Detection
  • Macros: Semantic - {Item Type} Markup Properties
  • Rule: Semantic - Has {Item Type} Markup Rule
  • Tag: Semantic - {Item Type} Markup Analytics Event

Making it even easier

Thanks to Google Tag Manager's amazing new API and Import/Export feature, you can speed up this whole process by importing a GTM Container Tag to your existing account. That way, you don't have to set up any of the above; you can just import it.

All you have to do is download this JSON file called " Semantic Analytics Headstart" (DropBox link) and then use the Import option in your Google Tag Manager account.

Within GTM, just select the Semantic Analytics Headstart JSON file you saved as your file to import, select Merge, and choose Overwrite. The only thing that this Container Tag has in it is the Semantic Macros, Rules, and Tags, so Merge and Overwrite will simply add these special features to your existing configuration. Just note that the Semantic Tags reference a Macro that contains your Universal Analytics tracking ID (i.e., make sure to edit the Macro called "Universal Anatlyics UA-ID" and put in your own tracking).

Semantic data in Google Analytics

Congratulations! You now have all the pieces in place to start receiving semantic data in Google Analytics. Go ahead, go check your Real Time Events report. I'll hang here.

Okay, seriously, how cool was that?

There's something incredibly special about giving your data meaning. Whether you get that by having an intimate relationship with your data platform, having super-advanced tagging in place, or making your analytics truly semantic by applying the principles of the semantic web to your data collection, you're doing something amazing. Now that you have semantic data in your analytics, you can drill down into specific categories and get some really cool information.

Another path

I feel like passing in semantic data as Events in Google Analytics is fairly straightforward, and the step-by-step process makes it fairly easy to grasp, but there's another (perhaps even better) way to add semantic data to your analytics. In analytics speak, a "dimension" is a descriptive attribute of a data object. Sounds pretty similar to itemprops on the semantic web, eh? So, why not set up Custom Dimensions in Google Analytics and use those to enhance our semantic analytics? Let's do it!

Fortunately, we've already put a lot of the pieces in place to access our semantic data, so we just have to create the Custom Dimension in Google Analytics and shoot data to it by adding a field in GTM. First, go to the Admin panel in you Google Analytics account and go to "Custom Definitions" > "Custom Dimensions". From there you'll want to create a new Custom Dimension called "Semantic Markup" with the "Scope" of "Hit" and set it to be active.

Make a mental note of what the index is; you'll need to specify it in Google Tag Manager. With the Semantic Event tag that we set up in GTM, we created an entirely new tag that would fire something on pages with semantic markup. For Custom Dimensions, we'll want to add something to our general analytics.js tag (the basic pageview tracking for Google Analytics). Once you find your main analytics tracking code in the list of tags, open it up and scross down to Custom Dimensions (under More Settings). Click the button to "Add Custom Dimension" and use the same index that you made a note of and, for the Dimension field, we'll use the same Macro we used for our Event label: Semantic - Event Markup Propertites.

Once you have this set up, you'll be able to bring in a "Semantic Markup" dimension to almost any Google Analytics report. Here's an example All Pages report that now displays Semantic Markup in addition to the Page URL.

I introduced this Custom Dimension approach as "another path," but really, I like to use it as a supplement and work both angles. Having both semantic events and semantic dimensions set up in Google Tag Manager won't cause any issues; it will just give you more meaningful data. Who doesn't love that?

Looking forward with semantic analytics

What can you accomplish by a applying semantic values to your data? That's what I'm most excited to find out.

I'm working on getting this up and running on sites that publish tons of content (Article markup), process thousands of eCommerce transactions (Product markup), and have lists of experts (Person markup). I'd love to see what semantic analytics could do for local business directories (Yelp), movie sites (IMDB), car dealerships, and recipe sites (my buddy Sam Edwards is already looking to implement this idea for Duncan Hines).

One of the biggest "mind blown moments" of my career was when I discovered that there was a whole semantic web community out there that wasn't just concerned with marking up content to get better looking snippets in the SERPs; they wanted to use semantic markup to make data more accessible and meaningful and to make the web a better place to be. I'm hoping that amazing folks like Aaron Bradley and Jarno van Driel will be able to help evolve this concept and inspire widespread adoption of semantic analytics.

If you have any questions, ideas for how this could be applied, or ways to extend this concept, let me know in the comments! Happy optimizing.


Sign up for The Moz Top 10, a semimonthly mailer updating you on the top ten hottest pieces of SEO news, tips, and rad links uncovered by the Moz team. Think of it as your exclusive digest of stuff you don't have time to hunt down but want to read!

By |October 28th, 2014|MOZ|0 Comments

Introducing Followerwonk Profile Pages

Posted by petebray

Followerwonk has always been primarily about social graph analysis and exploration: from tracking follower growth, comparing relationships, and so on.

Followerwonk now adds content analysis and user profiling, too

In the Analyze tab, you'll find a new option to examine any Twitter user's tweets. (Note that this is a Pro-only feature, so you'll need to be a subscriber to use it.)

You can also access these profile pages by simply clicking on a Twitter username anywhere else in Followerwonk.

For us, this feature is really exciting, because we let you analyze not just yourself, but other people too. In fact, Pro users can analyze as many other Twitter accounts as they want!

Now, you'll doubtlessly learn lots by analyzing your own tweets. But you already probably have a pretty good sense of what content works well for you (and who you engage with frequently).

We feel that Profile Pages really move the needle by letting you surface the relationships and content strategies of competitors, customers, and prospects.

Let's take a closer look.

Find the people any Twitter user engages with most frequently

Yep, just plug in a Twitter name and we'll analyze their most recent 2000 tweets. We'll extract out all of the mentions and determine which folks they talk to the most.

Here, we see that @dr_pete talks most frequently with (or about) Moz, Rand, Elisa, and Melissa. In fact, close to 10% of his tweets are talking to these four! (Note the percentage above each listed name.)

This analysis is helpful as it lets you quickly get a sense for the relationships that are important for this person. That provides possible inroads to that person in terms of engagement strategies.

Chart when and what conversations happen with an analyzed user's most important relationships

We don't just stop there. By clicking on the little “see engagement” link below each listed user, you can see the history of the relationship.

Here, we can see when the engagements happened in the little chart. And we actually show you the underlying tweets, too.

This is a great way to quickly understand the context of that relationship: is it a friendly back and forth, a heated exchange, or the last gasp of a bad customer experience? Perhaps the tweets from a competitor to one his top customers occurred weeks back? Maybe there's a chance for you to make inroads to that customer?

There's all sorts of productive tea-reading that can happen with this feature. And, by the way, don't forget that you already have the ability to track all the relationships a competitor forms (or breaks), too.

Rank any Twitter user's tweets by importance to surface their best content

This is my favorite feature—by far—in Followerwonk.

Sure, there are other tools that tell you your most popular tweets, but there are few that let you turn that feature around and examine other Twitter users. This is important because (let's face it) few of us have the volume of RTs and favorites to make self-analysis that useful. But when we examine top Twitter accounts, we come away with hints about what content strategies they're using that work well.

Here we see that Obama's top tweets include a tribute, an irreverent bit of humor, and an image that creatively criticizes a recent Supreme Court ruling. What lessons might you draw from the content that works best for Obama? What content works best for other people? Their image tweets? Tweets with humor? Shorter tweets? Tweets with links? Go do some analyzing!

Uncover top source domains of any Twitter users

Yep, we dissect all the URLs for any analyzed user to assemble a list of their top domains.

This feature offers a great way to quickly snapshot the types of content and sources that users draw material from. Moreover, we can click on "see mentions" to see a timeline of when those mentions occurred for each domain, as well as what particular tweets accounted for them.

In sum…

These features offer exciting ways to quickly profile users. Such analysis should be at the heart of any engagement strategy: understand who your target most frequently engages with, what content makes them successful, and what domains they pull from.

At the same time, this approach reveals content strategies—what, precisely, works well for you, but also for other thought leaders in your category. Not only can you draw inspiration from this approach, but you can find content that might deserve a retweet (or reformulation in your own words).

I don't want to go too Freudian on you, but consider this: What's the value of self-analysis? I mean that to say that unless you have a lot of data, any analytics product isn't going to be totally useful. That's why this addition in Followerwonk is so powerful. Now you can analyze others, including thought leaders in your particular industry, to find the secrets of their social success.

Start analyzing!

Finally, this is a bittersweet blog post for me. It's my last one as a Mozzer. I'm off to try my hand at another bootstrapping startup: this time, software that lets you build feature tours and elicit visitor insights. I'm leaving Followerwonk in great hands, and I look forward to seeing awesome new features down the line. Of course, you can always stay in touch with me on Twitter. Keep on wonkin'!


Sign up for The Moz Top 10, a semimonthly mailer updating you on the top ten hottest pieces of SEO news, tips, and rad links uncovered by the Moz team. Think of it as your exclusive digest of stuff you don't have time to hunt down but want to read!

By |October 27th, 2014|MOZ|0 Comments

Is It Possible to Have Good SEO Simply by Having Great Content – Whiteboard Friday

Posted by randfish

This question, posed by Alex Moravek in our Q&A section, has a somewhat complicated answer. In today's Whiteboard Friday, Rand discusses how organizations might perform well in search rankings without doing any link building at all, relying instead on the strength of their content to be deemed relevant and important by Google.

For reference, here's a still of this week's whiteboard!

Video transcription

Howdy Moz fans, and welcome to another edition of Whiteboard Friday. This week we're chatting about is it possible to have good SEO simply by focusing on great content to the exclusion of link building.

This question was posed in the Moz Q&A Forum, which I deeply love, by Alex Moravek -- I might not be saying your name right, Alex, and for that I apologize -- from SEO Agencias in Madrid. My Spanish is poor, but my love for churros is so strong.

Alex, I think this is a great question. In fact, we get asked this all the time by all sorts of folks, particularly people in the blogging world and people with small and medium businesses who hear about SEO and go, "Okay, I think can make my website accessible, and yes, I can produce great content, but I just either don't feel comfortable, don't have time and energy, don't understand, or just don't feel okay with doing link building." Link acquisition through an outreach and a manual process is beyond the scope of what they can fit into their marketing activities.

In fact, it is possible kind of, sort of. It is possible, but what you desperately need in order for this strategy to be possible are really two things. One is content exposure, and two you need time. I'll explain why you need both of these things.

I'm going to dramatically simplify Google's ranking algorithm. In fact, I'm going to simplify it so much that those of you who are SEO professionals are going to be like, "Oh God, Rand, you're killing me." I apologize in advance. Just bear with me a second.

We basically have keywords and on-page stuff, topical relevance, etc. All your topic modeling stuff might go in there. There's content quality, all the factors that Google and Bing might measure around a content's quality. There's domain authority. There's link-based authority based on the links that point to all the pages on a given domain that tell Google or Bing how important pages on this particular domain are.

There are probably some topical relevance elements in there, too. There's page level authority. These could be all the algorithms you've heard of like PageRank and TrustRank, etc., and all the much more modern ones of those.

I'm not specifically talking about Moz scores here, the Moz scores DA and PA. Those are rough interpretations of these much more sophisticated formulas that the engines have.

There's user and usage data, which we know the engines are using. They've talked about using that. There's spam analysis.

Super simplistic. There are these six things, six broad categories of ranking elements. If you have just these four -- keywords, on-page content quality, user and usage data, spam analysis, you're not spammy -- without these, without any domain authority or any page authority, it's next to impossible to rank for competitive terms and very challenging and very unlikely to rank even for stuff in the chunky middle and long tail. Long tail you might rank for a few things if it's very, very long tail. But these things taken together give you a sense of ranking ability.

Here's what some marketers, some bloggers, some folks who invest in content nearly to the exclusion of links have found. They have had success with this strategy. They've basically elected to entirely ignore link building and let links come to them.

Instead of focusing on link building, they're going to focus on product quality, press and public relations, social media, offline marketing, word of mouth, content strategy, email marketing, these other channels that can potentially earn them things. Advertising as well potentially could be in here.

What they rely on is that people find them through these other channels. They find them through social, through ads, through offline, through blogs, through very long tail search, through their content, maybe their email marketing list, word of mouth, press. All of these things are discovery mechanisms that are not search.

Once people get to the site, then these websites rely on the fact that, because of the experience people have, the quality of their products, of their content, because all of that stuff is so good, they're going to earn links naturally.

This is a leap. In fact, for many SEOs, this is kind of a crazy leap to make, because there are so many things that you can do that will nudge people in this link earning direction. We've talked about a number of those at Moz. Of course, if you visit the link building section of our blog, there are hundreds if not thousands of great strategies around this.

These folks have elected to ignore all that link building stuff, let the links come to them, and these signals, these people who visit via other channels eventually lead to links which lead to DA, PA ranking ability. I don't think this strategy is for everyone, but it is possible.

I think in the utopia that Larry Page and Sergey Brin from Google imagined when they were building their first search engine this is, in fact, how they hoped that the web would work. They hoped that people wouldn't be out actively gaming and manipulating the web's link graph, but rather that all the links would be earned naturally and editorially.

I think that's a very, very optimistic and almost naive way of thinking about it. Remember, they were college students at the time. Maybe they were eating their granola, and dancing around, and hoping that everyone on the web would link only for editorial reasons. Not to make fun of granola. I love granola, especially, oh man, with those acai berries. Bowls of those things are great.

This is a potential strategy if you are very uncomfortable with link building and you feel like you can optimize this process. You have all of these channels going on.

For SEOs who are thinking, "Rand, I'm never going to ignore link building," you can still get a tremendous amount out of thinking about how you optimize the return on investment and especially the exposure that you receive from these and how that might translate naturally into links.

I find looking at websites that accomplish SEO without active link building fascinating, because they have editorially earned those links through very little intentional effort on their own. I think there's a tremendous amount that we can take away from that process and optimize around this.

Alex, yes, this is possible. Would I recommend it? Only in a very few instances. I think that there's a ton that SEOs can do to optimize and nudge and create intelligent, non-manipulative ways of earning links that are a little more powerful than just sitting back and waiting, but it is possible.

All right, everyone. Thanks for joining us, and we'll see you again next week for another edition of Whiteboard Friday. Take care.

Video transcription by Speechpad.com


Sign up for The Moz Top 10, a semimonthly mailer updating you on the top ten hottest pieces of SEO news, tips, and rad links uncovered by the Moz team. Think of it as your exclusive digest of stuff you don't have time to hunt down but want to read!

By |October 24th, 2014|MOZ|0 Comments